"Clinical Prediction Rules: Do
They Work?"
If you aren't familiar with Clinical Prediction Rules
(CPRs), you probably should be. They have become a
hot topic within the physical therapy research in the
past few years and it's time to take a fair and balanced
look at them.
CPRs have been around a while and previously have been used
in medicine to help physicians better classify and manage
patients, but have only showed up in the PT literature for
around 5-6 years. They are at the forefront of
evidence-based practice research.
A simple way of understanding what CPRs are is thes:
If your patient presents with complaint of 'X',
and has cluster signs, positive test findings and other
variables such as 'a', 'b', 'c', and 'd', then you
could implement a specific treatment and expect with a high
degreee of probability that they would have a predictable
outcome.
It is a tool to aid in clinical decision making by
statistically combining clinical finding sto improve the
accuracy of diagnosis, prognosis, or prediction of response
to treatment for patients.
Now, the good and bad...
Sounds awesome to have such a tool right?
Well, for various orthopedic conditions, this would be
exactly what we need. To be able to rapidly find four
or five variables that wehn combined allow you to NOT have
to scratch your head figuring out what to do, would be
fantastic. This type of information would set us
further apart from chiropractic and other wanna-be therapy
delivery persons.
To remove arbitrary "noise" from the patient evaluation and
relyon probabilities would certainly make clinical decision
making easier.
However...
-
When it comes to LBP, there is little homogeneity
amongst patients in our clinics which can make
application of the rules difficult in real clinical
practice.
-
Few (if any) of the CPR studies have had validation
studies (much less a longitudinal or comparateive
outcome studies) examining them to see whether or
not they are clinically useful (as of 2009) .
-
A fair amount of work in the classification of LBP
indicates that fear-avoidance is behaviors are a
recurring theme in treating patients as well as in
outcomes. What this means is yet unclear.
-
We are relying on math to do our jobs in developing
the CPRs; this assumes that the data input into
them was reliable and valid (i.e. truthful).
And...we don't even know if they are designed
correctly.
And the biggest question is:
"..are they clinically valid and will they
improve care?"
I've heard and read arguments on both sides.
For now, you don't have to wait for a CPR to be anointed to
begin using. They either work or they
don't. Your patients will decide for you.
Today, start looking at which of your patients with LBP
also have a concomitant reduction in hip rotation and
abduction ipsilateral to the LBP. (Some have it
contralateral, but lets just put our toe in the water)
This is a tell sign that when combined with certain tests
that have been validated will suggest manipulation
to the low back/pelvis will help.
|